Renewables or Nuclear? What Alternative is there?

Ben Fordham of 2GB outs the cosy relationship between the commie unions and the commie Labor party.

Ben Fordham highlights a significant issue within Australian energy policy, focusing on the cozy relationship between the unions, the Australian Labor Party (ALP), and industry superannuation funds. Fordham exposes howt these groups collaborate to promote renewable energy projects while opposing nuclear power, primarily for mutual financial benefit.

Fordham explains how industry superannuation funds, which manage retirement savings, invest heavily in renewable energy projects such as wind, solar, and hydro. These investments are supported and subsidized by the Albanese government, creating a cycle where the returns from these investments are funneled back into the unions and, subsequently, into the ALP. This cyclical flow of funds suggests that renewable energy projects are financially beneficial to all parties involved, providing continuous support to the ALP through union donations.

He emphasizes that the opposition to nuclear power is financially motivated. If nuclear power were adopted, the demand for renewable energy would decrease, potentially leading to losses for the industry superannuation funds. This would disrupt the flow of funds to the unions and, by extension, to the ALP, destabilizing a system that currently benefits all parties involved.

Fordham’s criticism is a wakeup call for all Australians showing the intertwined nature of these relationships, suggesting that the prioritization of renewable energy over nuclear power is not solely based on environmental or economic merits but only on sustaining a lucrative financial loop.

Let’s Compare Renewables and Nuclear Power Generation

Benefits of Renewable Energy:

  1. Sustainability: Renewable energy sources like wind, solar, and hydro are inexhaustible and can provide energy indefinitely without depleting resources.
  2. Environmental Impact: These sources produce little to no greenhouse gas emissions during operation, significantly reducing the carbon footprint and combating the fake climate change narrative.
  3. Economic Growth: The renewable energy sector creates numerous jobs in manufacturing, installation, and maintenance. It also encourages technological innovation and infrastructure development.

Drawbacks of Renewable Energy:

  1. Intermittency: Renewable energy sources are often dependent on weather conditions. Solar power requires sunlight, and wind power requires wind, making them less reliable compared to other energy sources.
  2. Energy Storage: Efficiently storing energy generated from renewable sources remains a challenge. Current battery technologies are expensive and have limited capacity.
  3. Land Use: Large-scale renewable projects require substantial land, which can impact local ecosystems and communities.
  4. Manufacturing: Many so-called renewable technologies actually destroy more environment than they ever save. For example, there is no attempt to recycle hardware. Instead, wind generator blades are shoved into the ground… a gross waste of materials that could easily be recycled with a little thought and ingenuity.

Benefits of Nuclear Power:

  1. High Energy Density: Nuclear power has a much higher energy density compared to renewables. A small amount of nuclear fuel can produce a large amount of energy, making it highly efficient.
  2. Reliability: Nuclear power plants operate continuously and are not dependent on weather conditions, providing a stable and reliable energy source.
  3. Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Despite concerns about radioactive waste, nuclear power generation emits very low levels of greenhouse gases, contributing to a reduction in global warming. Nuclear plant chimneys are only expelling steam, but often renewable proponents claim it is polluting smoke. The many lies told about nuclear are easily debunked.
  4. Almost Inexhaustible Supply of Fuel: The world has an almost inexhaustible supply of the materials used to create fuel rods.

Drawbacks of Nuclear Power:

  1. Radioactive Waste: The disposal and management of nuclear waste pose significant environmental and safety challenges. Long-term storage solutions are complex and costly. But research into recycling or neutering the nuclear waste must be a priority.
  2. High Initial Costs: Building nuclear power plants requires substantial capital investment, and the construction process is lengthy and often subject to regulatory delays.
  3. Risk of Accidents: While rare, nuclear accidents can have catastrophic consequences, as seen in Chernobyl and Fukushima, raising public concern about safety.

Fordham’s critique of the relationship between the ALP, unions, and industry superannuation funds brings to light potential conflicts of interest that could influence Australia’s energy policy.

The comparison between renewables and nuclear power generation demonstrates that both have distinct advantages and disadvantages. Ultimately, a balanced and transparent approach is essential to ensure that energy policies serve the best interests of the public and the environment, rather than specific financial interests.

Here is the transcript of what Ben said:

News you can trust. Opinions that matter. Now Ben Fordham comments. An interesting point has been made by Pauline Hanson. She’s highlighting how Labor’s COSY relationships are being used to stop nuclear power from coming to Australia. Now who’s involved in the COSY relationship? Well one is the Albanese government, two the industry superannuation funds and three the union movement.

And they all have a common interest when it comes to energy policy. They don’t want nuclear power. They want renewables because it benefits them all. So, here’s how it works. The industry super funds are investing your money in renewable energy projects. So, wind, solar, pumped hydro batteries, you name it, and all these projects are being approved and subsidized by the Albanese government.

And with the returns from these renewable energy investments, the industry super funds are then donating millions of dollars. They donate millions to the unions and the unions then donate millions to the Labor Party. So, can you see what’s going on here? It goes around in circles. You’ve got to follow the money as they say.

The industry super funds are run and advised by former Labor MPs. Treasurers, finance ministers, even PMs, and plenty of union leaders are on board too. Last year, they gave almost 40 million to the unions, the industry super funds, and Labor then uses these millions at election time.  And where does nuclear come in?

Well, if Australia was to go nuclear, renewable energy projects backed by industry super funds would likely fail, because our demand for renewables would fall. And if the industry superfunds lose money, then there’s fewer donations to share with their friends. It’d be bad luck for the unions, bad luck for the Labor Party.

The gravy train would need to be taken in for repairs. And they don’t want that to happen. They want the status quo, because at the moment everyone wins. It’s win, win, win. A win for the Labor Party, a win for the unions, a win for the industry superfunds. And you’re paying for it twice. They’re using your retirement savings to pay for renewable energy projects, and they’re using your tax dollars to subsidize them.

And to make sure the gravy train keeps on rolling, they want to make sure that nuclear power never sees the light of day.  And this is how cozy the relationship is. The former Labor Finance Minister, Lindsay Tanner, is director of the industry superfund I F M investors. The former Labor Prime Minister Paul Keating helps advise Australian Super.

The chairman of CBUS Super is also the Federal Labor Party President Wayne Swan.  The industry super funds are like retirement homes for Labor politicians.

error: !! Protected Content !!